![]() In fact, what we really want is for the preferential treatment to stop. We won't start suing local authorities for allowing baa baa black sheep to be sung in schools. ![]() In the meantime, worry not Mr Straw, we are not asking to be given preferential treatment. The black and Asian communities will wait with bated breath to see if these laws really make a difference. preferential treatment is a just method to create equality within the society. INTRODUCTION The internal logic of anti-discrimination legislation leads from the prohibition of invidious discrimination to various types of preferential. ![]() Does he really think black and Asian people need to start making up racist incidents? If only.Īlready this month both Neville Lawrence, father of Stephen, and John Sentamu, Anglican Bishop of Stepney and the only black member of the Lawrence inquiry, have been subject to what they described as humiliating stop and searches by the police.Īnd yet the police have been complaining that post-Macpherson has made them wary of using those powers. Mr Straw's concern about a rash of legal action pre-empts the cries of "political correctness gone mad" sure to emanate from the rightwing. It took the threat of a highly embarrassing revolt by the black and Asian Labour peers in the House of Lords to change his mind. Only last week, 6 years after the murder of Stephen Lawrence and nearly a year on from Macpherson, Mr Straw was holding fast that there was no need to include institutional racism in the race relations law. In which case, why did he make the amendment in the first place? Mr Straw is basically saying he is worried about an avalanche of legal challenges from litigious black people claiming institutional racism. ![]() Everything from local council employment policies to police stop and search practices will have to be clearly thought through before being acted upon, and if they are found to discriminate against particular racial groups they risk expensive legal action.Īccording to Mr Straw, "the government has always been in favour of this principle, but has been concerned that the provisions were effective without leaving public bodies open to routine legal challenge where their policies were entirely proper." And there's the rub. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |